On the outcome of this study, ideas can be produced for further practices regarding dispute solution. Inside the related literary works, generally social experience degree (Openshaw, Mills, Adams, Durso, 1992), telecommunications and you will problem solving knowledge (Clarke Greenberg, 1986; DeForest Hugles, 1992; Long Adams, 2001) and you can behavioral means (Robin, Patrica, Moye, 1995; Strength, 1992) were used in knowledge of conflict quality. Yet not, intellectual behavioural treatment had been good at ent away from conflict solution experiences (Hoyer, Fecht, Louterback Schneider, 2001; Spillane-Grieco, 2000). So it initiatives adds that individuals can obtain a lot more fulfillment off their connections.
There are lots of constraints which determine generalization of these overall performance. Basic, the analysis try limited amount of new member and take to try hired off college students. For this reason, the brand new samplecan not represent all teenage. Second, parents-kids relations try checked-out by using thinking-statement strategies and you may anly away from adolescents’ angle. It actions gives minimal details about relations. Third, individuals’ impression regarding the family are tested certain duration of interaction, not across the period.
Upcoming knowledge would-be imitate the present study and sample out of individuals of individuals years and you may community. Morever, moms and dads teenagers interactions shall be reviewed using different methods such biggercity videotaped otherwise head observation. Observational degree you may provide addiitional information in the specifically relatives and you may parents’ perception from the loved ones can be regarded as for the next studies. This research can be frequent in some periods inside a beneficial longitudinal analysis which could offer much more realistic overall performance.
Addis, J. Bernard, M. Elizabeth. (2002). Marital changes and you will irrational philosophy. Journal of Rational-emotive and Intellectual Behavioural Medication, 20, 3-thirteen.
Akbalik, Grams. (2001). Catiflma cozme olce inin gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismas>. (the analysis from validity away from reliability away from Argument Quality Size). Turk Psikolojik Dan>flma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, sixteen,7-thirteen
Clark, K. Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Differential ramifications of gestalt one or two-settee intervention and you can troubleshooting in solving desicional dispute. Journal regarding Guidance Psychology, 33,11-fifteen.
After that mental input considering cognitive decisions idea will be used to people in order to be attention to the with dysfunctional dating thinking and its adverse effects on the disagreement solution processes and alter their dysfunctional values
Cramer, D. (2004). Effect of the latest harmful beliefs disgareement values on matchmaking fulfillment which have aromantic mate or best friend. Mindset and you can Psychotherapy, 77, 121-133.
Debord, J., Romans, S. C., Krieshok, T. (1996). Forecasts dyadic variations out-of general and you will matchmaking specific beliefs. Record from Psychology, 130, 263-280.
DeForest, P. Hughes, J.(1992). Treatments for mother-adolescent dispute as a result of behavioural techonology education: research study. Diary off Educational Emotional Appointment, step 3,281-301.
DiGuiseppe, Roentgen. Zee, C. (1986). A rational emotive principle away from relationship malfunction and you will relationship medication. Diary of Rational-emotive and you may Intellectual Behavioral Treatment, cuatro, 22-37.
Unlikely viewpoints from clinical couples: The relationship to standards, requires and satisfaction
Eidelson, Roentgen. J. Epstein, Letter. (1982). Knowledge and you will matchmaking maladjustment: Development of a way of measuring dysfunctional relationship opinions. Record regarding Asking and Medical Psychology, 50, 715-720.
Emmelkamp, P. G., Krol, B., Sanderman, R., Ruphan, Meters. (1987). This new evaluation from relationship values into the relationship framework. Character and you will Private Differences, 8, 775-780.
Epstein, N., Baucom., D. H., Rankin, L. A beneficial. (1993). Therapy of relationship conflict: a cognitive behavioural strategy. Medical Therapy Review, thirteen, 45-57.
Epstein, Letter., Finnegan, B. Bythell, D. (1979). Irrational philosophy and you will perception off relationship dispute. Diary regarding Asking and you will Systematic Therapy, 47, 608-610.
Epstein, N., Pretzer, J. L. Fleming, B. (1987). The new role out-of intellectual appraisal from inside the care about-records regarding relationship correspondence. Behavior Therapy, 18, 51-69.
Eryuksel, A. (1996). Anne baba ve ergen iliflkilerinin problem cozme iletiflim becerileri biliflsel carptmalar ve aile yaps acsndan incelenmesi.(The analysis regarding friends family with regards to troubleshooting, communications feel, intellectual deformation and you will household members design). Yaynlanmamls Doktora Tezi. (Unpublished grasp thesis) Ege Univeristesi.
Connect with us