
Overlook the British; are casinos ever coming to Massachusetts? (Image source: Britannica.com)
Last year, Massachusetts passed casino gambling legislation, but in 2013, it’s still uncertain whether that may trigger any casinos that are actual integrated their state. While that legislation managed to make it possible for licensing as high as three casinos in differing regarding the state (along with one parlor that is slots, a variety of reluctant communities and a brutally intrusive gaming commission are beginning in order to make some wonder if anyone will ever get authorized for a casino there.
Uphill Battle So Far
Here’s the reality: many communities have rejected the theory of getting a casino in their neighborhood. East Boston and Palmer both said no to casinos on this Election that is past Day even though many other towns stopped proposals from going ahead before they ever got on the ballot. It doesn’t suggest every casino has been refused, of course. Milford is working with Foxwoods on a proposal that will be taken up to a vote on November 19, while the town of Everett overwhelmingly approved a Wynn project, with 87 percent of voters coming away in favor of it. And MGM won a casino vote in Springfield this summer also.
But that alone is not enough. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission must also accept the companies that will be running these casinos, and that is just starting to appear to be a real issue in many of these instances. When Suffolk Downs learned that the commission had serious questions about Caesars working they dropped the casino giant from their proposal a move that added confusion to the vote in East Boston, and may have ultimately decided the election with them.
Can Anyone Pass Muster?
Those same questions could be raised with other companies who have actually yet to be vetted.
‘Given what happened with Caesars, it’s undoubtedly a possibility now with Wynn and MGM, since they both have issues with SEC investigations or issues in Macau which have been raised by other commissions,’ said Clyde Barrow, teacher of public policy at UMass Dartmouth. ‘ should they’re going to use that exact same strict standard…we could arrive at the end of the road and have to start out over all again.’
Really, you can find some businesses which have been vetted, but have had their casino plans refused by towns, and other people who have already been approved by towns but are yet to get that same vetting. So far, no one has passed both steps.
There are some signs that are bright if you should be prepared to look for them. It’s most likely that somebody will receive a permit for the slot parlor, as several communities have given the light that is green hosting that facility, and chances are that the gaming commission will discover one or more of them suitable (though in the end, only 1 are going to be opted for as the host).
But as for the larger casino projects, some observers are actually wondering in the event that casino that is major may simply give up and leave if the current frontrunners are rejected by Massachusetts, specially if they feel that doing business there is certainly more trouble than it is well worth. And although the continuing state has not quite reached that point yet, that is certainly getting near.
Just Like the Gold Rush, Big Bucks Is in Bitcoin Mining Equipment
Echoing Samuel Brannan back in the California Gold Rush, the real money being made in Bitcoins today is by individuals attempting to sell the mining equipment (Image source: Discovery Channel)
Bitcoins keep hitting the news today; whether as the crypto-currency of choice for nefarious Internet dealings on recently busted Silk path, or being a highly volatile type of digital money whose consumer-based valuations fluctuate wildly, recently skyrocketing to the stage that some economists say they are a bubble planning to burst.
Selling to the Miners
But now it turns out the real profit Bitcoins is not in the virtual cash it self; it’s into the computer equipment getting continuously more sophisticated to ‘mine’ the Bitcoins that the real cash lies. Here’s a little history:
Bitcoin transactions depend on computer sites which can be able to untangle complex math formulas in order to clear transactions and make sure the virtual coins would be the article that is genuine. These sites then generate new Bitcoins once these mathematics issues have fixed, which are forwarded to those that operate the systems themselves. Naturally, the more coins get created, the more difficult these cryptographic equations become, which additionally helps to hedge inflation regarding the money.
One person that is such runs these systems is 27-year-old Aaron Jackson-Wilde, who paid some $2,000 for their setup, which can be run by extremely specialized computer chips. These chips are specifically designed to both operate and maintain his Bitcoin system, while simultaneously creating a small reward money in what has turned out to be known as ‘Bitcoin mining.’
Attempting to Turn a Profit No Easy Task
The hope of these ‘miners’ much like their namesakes of old would be to make more in Bitcoins than they end up investing to ‘mine’ no feat that is easy a few of these setups can run as much as $20,000 or more, as well as the electric expenses involved whenever all this equipment is humming 24/7/365. Appropriate now, the coins are at an all-time high of this exact carbon copy of $200; that’s vs. $12 per coin only a year ago at this time around. So money is here to be made for the savvy few.
But just like with all the California Gold Rush, is huuuge safe the more miners jump in the fray, the harder it gets to really earn money mining. Because of the recent dramatic spike in Bitcoins’ value, increasingly more miners have gotten involved, whom in turn have gotten more powerful chips, significantly upping the workload overall in the Bitcoin community.
This overload, in turn, then drove up the complexity of verifying each transaction made utilizing the cryptographically transmitted data, and that is making it harder and harder for miners to recoup their mining gear investment costs. Andreas Antonopoulos, a currency that is digital in San Francisco, explains: ‘Bitcoin makes silicon perishable. Your mining rig rots away in front of one’s eyes every day you have it.’
Back in the real Gold Rush days, it had been men like Samuel Brannan, Levi Strauss (yes, the jeans guy) and Phillip Armour (who went on to become meatpacking that is famous) whom were just a few of the equipment and service providers who made far greater fortunes off the 1849 rush than anybody who actually discovered gold. And it appears perhaps not much has changed for the reason that arena.
‘It’s the guys who offer the equipment who are making the money, not the Bitcoin miners,’ said Jackson-Wilde, who works times as supervisor at a bike battery company.
In reality, one such maker, CoinTerra, estimates that the marketplace for Bitcoin mining chips could reach as high as $100 million per year for the next three years alone, according to current valuations.
Experts within the mining field expect some 1.4 million bitcoins that are new be created by the technology during those same three years, which will amount to some $280 million each year if current trade rates stay fairly stable. Since Bitcoins’ initial creation back in 2008, about 11.9 million Bitcoins respected at $2.4 billion in current exchanges have been minted.
WHERE DID BITCOINS ORIGINATE FROM?
Bitcoins first started circulating via the Internet in 2009 after that initial introduction that is conceptual someone presenting under the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto. It quickly became a popular as a type of ‘antimoney’ exactly what was perceived by some as a viable alternative to bank-backed national currencies, due to its theoretically untraceable source. Its value is based solely on which its users perceive it to be right now. It really is currently considered the preeminent form of digital currency.
Even though the cryptocurrency has drawn an abundance of attention through the law the FBI recently seized and shut down the Silk path website, that used the monetary form for all its numerous illicit transactions it’s also been skyrocketing in value lately and is now attracting the attention of some legitimate investors, some of whom see the coins as becoming a serious force in e-commerce.
PokerStars Denied Nj-new Jersey On The Web Gaming License, For Now
Unconfirmed word on the street is that PokerStars is denied their New Jersey license that is iGaming but don’t count them away from the game just yet.
Atlantic City’s online casino launch may be just around the corner it’s set for November 26th but looks like the world’s biggest poker that is online defintely won’t be partaking in the celebrations. PokerStars part of the huge Black Friday scandal of 2011 has apparently been rejected a New Jersey license that is iGaming.
DoJ Criminal Case Nevertheless a Stain on PS Reputation
The main reason cited for the denial happens to be the latest Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement’s impending unlawful case against PokerStars founder Isai Scheinberg, including allegations of bank fraud and money laundering as outlined within the illegal Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006.
Just this June that is past’s son Mark paid $50 million to the feds, who in return had been essentially permitted to admit to no ‘wrongdoing, culpability, liability, or guilt’ in the matter. That, but, had no affect the New Jersey gaming regulator’s actions; most likely, they got no bit of that financial pie.
All Hope Not Lost
Mind you, this won’t mean that PokerStars is out of the iGaming business forever in New Jersey by any means. In fact, many predicted this as a possible initial outcome, and the Scheinbergs themselves cannot be completely stunned by the reported denial. Although PokerStars settled their civil indictments with all the Department of Justice back in 2012 once they shelled out $547 million in a peace providing to reimburse other poker website complete Tilt’s failure to do so with their online clients, that had no effect on the criminal situation that has been brought against both the senior Scheinberg and PokerStars Director of Payments Paul Tate, who had been one of the 11 men indicted by the feds on April 11, 2011.
Apparently what might be at play here is Isai’s alleged involvement that is continued operating the organization, despite the fact that formally he turned the reigns up to son Mark. As an example, the Atlantic Club Casino Resort in Atlantic City which PokerStars made a bid on, was rejected, and who then got sued by the rejected suitor claimed in court that Daddy Isai was indeed involved in phone convos that took place while that deal had been discussed, a big no-no.
So exactly what will PokerStars likely have to do now to have back the good graces of this brand New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement? Perhaps, agree to absolutely zero involvement by any of this kingpin Black figures, such as Isai or Paul Tate friday.
If true, this licensing dis will not merely impact PokerStars Internet plans in nj; land gaming ventures will also be affected. A $10 million-dollar poker that is planned at the Resorts Casino Hotel will also need to go into ‘hold’ mode until the certification issues are sorted down.
And This Late-Breaking News…
An additional bit that is shocking of, it seems that the now-infamous Atlantic Club has just filed for bankruptcy. The casino is seeking Chapter 11 protection, but will stay open and running while this happens. Atlantic Club’s litigation with PokerStars is still ongoing; a matter which cannot have helped with cost-control measures for the property that is teetering.
Comments 0