Thought of in the place of claimed social referent approval and connection relationship and effort


Thought of in the place of claimed social referent approval and connection relationship and effort

Mate preferences during the matchmaking

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Off attractive to terrible: Disenchantment having an intimate partner. Sociological Viewpoints, 44, 263-280. [ Links ]

Fiore, An effective. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily in dating: When would you for example individuals instance yourself? CHI, meeting towards the people facts inside calculating expertise. 1317-1374. [ Backlinks ]

Furman, W. (1985)patibility and you can incompatibility into the children’s peer and you will brother matchmaking. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will incompatible matchmaking (pp. 61-87). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. Age., & Christensen, An effective. (2004). Wild birds away from good feather otherwise strange wild birds? Links one of personality size, similarity, and you may ily Psychology, cuatro, 564-574. [ Backlinks ]

Gaunt, R. (2006). Couple similarity and relationship satisfaction: Are comparable partners happy. Diary out of Character, 74, 1401-1420. [ Backlinks ]

Goffman, Age. (1952). To your cooling the target aside: Specific element of type so you can inability. Psychiatry, 15, 451-463. [ Website links ]

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, overlap, and relationship pleasure from inside the relationships and you may maried people. Diary out of Identification and you can Social Psychology, 93, 34-forty-eight. [ Hyperlinks ]

Personal Relationships, fifteen, 281-295

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror: The necessity of appears for the daily life. Albany: Condition University of the latest York Drive. [ Backlinks ]

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Coordinating theory. When you look at the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher mest populära Latina-datingappar (Eds.), Encyclopedia out of human matchmaking (Vol. dos, pp. 10651067). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Links ]

Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, Yards., & Existe, J. (1985). Collateral and you may romantic interactions: Latest lookup. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and in conflict relationship (pp. 91-117). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, An effective., & Ariely, D. (2010). Complimentary and you will sorting when you look at the dating. American Monetary Review, 100, 130-163. [ Backlinks ]

Houran, J., Lange, R., Rentfrow, J. P., & Bruckner, K. H. (2004). Do online relationships screening really works? An evaluation off first evidence getting a publicized ‘predictive model of erican Diary regarding Therapy, 6, 507-526. [ Links ]

Houts, Roentgen. M., Robins, Elizabeth., & Huston, T. L. (1996)patibility and growth of preily, 58, 7-20. [ Backlinks ]

Huston, T., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. (2001). Early marital origins regarding conjugal distress and splitting up. Most recent Tips in the Psychological Technology, 10, 116-119. [ Backlinks ]

Ickes, W. (1985). Addition. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will in conflict matchmaking (pp. 1-7). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Ickes, W., & Charania, Yards. R. (2009)patibility. For the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia out-of human matchmaking (Vol. step 1, pp. 283-286). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Links ]

Kalick, S. Yards., & Hamilton III, T. E. (1986). The fresh complimentary hypothesis reexamined. Diary off Identification and you will Social Mindset, 51 , 673-682. [ Website links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1995). The fresh longitudinal span of marital high quality and you will balance: A look at concept, actions, and you will browse. Emotional Bulletin, 118, 3-34. [ Links ]

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, relationship communication, and the trajectory away from relationship pleasure. Diary away from Character and you can Personal Therapy, 72, 1075-1092. [ Website links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (2005). Contextual influences towards the relationships: Ramifications for coverage and you may intervention. Current Advice when you look at the Psychological Research, 14, 171-174. [ Links ]

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, Age., Christensen, A good., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G. Peterson, D.R. (1983). Considering romantic relationships. In H. H. Kelley, Age. Berscheid, A good. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, Grams. Levinger. D. Roentgen. Peterson (Eds.), Personal relationship (pp. 20-67). Ny: Freeman. [ Backlinks ]

Thought of in the place of claimed social referent approval and connection relationship and effort

Choose A Format
Story
Formatted Text with Embeds and Visuals
Video
Youtube, Vimeo or Vine Embeds
Image
Photo or GIF