M genitalium was detected in 33 of the individuals in our Add Health subsample, which resulted in a weighted prevalence of 1.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.45, 1.46) (Table 1 ). The prevalence of M genitalium among men (1.1%; 95% CI=0.49, 2.44) and among women (0.8%; 95% CI=0.42, 1.57) was not significantly different (P=.57). Despite some trends, overall there was no significant difference in M genitalium prevalence by age or geographic region, but prevalence varied by race/ethnicity: it was highest among Blacks (4.0%; 95% CI=0.20, 6.63) and was somewhat higher among Latinos (0.8%; 95% CI=0.14, 4.08) compared with Whites (0.4%; 95% CI=0.19, 0.89; P<.001). The organism was not detected in anyone of American Indian or Asian descent.
M genitalium prevalence was significantly higher among Blacks compared with Whites (prevalence ratio [PR] = 8.9; 95% CI = 3.34, ). 4; 95% CI = 3.57, ; Table 1 ). 1% compared with 0.05% among those who did not report vaginal intercourse (PR = 22.5; 95% CI = 4.35, ). Although M genitalium prevalence rose with increased numbers of sexual partners (lifetime and past year), M genitalium–positive respondents reported fewer mean episodes of vaginal intercourse during the past year compared with M genitalium–negative respondents (21.9 vs 69.4; P < .001). M genitalium infection was not significantly associated with age at sexual debut or with correct and consistent condom use (condom use during every episode of vaginal intercourse without any breakage or slippage) within the past 12 months, but it was more often detected among those who had used condoms during their last vaginal intercourse (PR = 4.1; 95% CI = 1.21, ).
Among intimately effective someone (people that claimed previously that have engaged in genital gender), Meters genitalium prevalence was step 1
Yards genitalium prevalence are significantly higher one of https://www.datingranking.net/it/incontri-indu women who utilized depo provera during the past 12 months (PR=cuatro.5; 95% CI=step one.46, ), however, incidence was not in the use of almost every other hormonal contraceptives overall. In keeping with large-exposure sexual intercourse, Yards genitalium incidence is actually notably higher certainly one of participants which noticed it you will currently feel contaminated that have Letter gonorrhoeae otherwise C trachomatis (PR=step 3.4; 95% CI=step one.09, ), among participants which checked confident to own C trachomatis (PR=5.4; 95% CI=step 1.42, ), and you can certainly one of female contaminated which have HPV (PR=a dozen.7; 95% CI=step 3.29, ). Not one of your own individuals infected that have Yards genitalium said the signs of urethral otherwise vaginal discharge sometimes in this in the last day or during the prior 1 year (and people who was coinfected along with other STI pathogens), but dos.2% said dysuria before day (data maybe not found). Likewise, not one of the M genitalium–positive someone claimed diagnoses from nongonococcal urethritis, mucopurulent cervicitis, otherwise vaginitis during the past 12 months.
Some of the Meters genitalium–contaminated individuals exactly who did not declaration vaginal gender had either exclusively same-sex lovers or considering no analysis into other sorts of sexual craft that may features contributed to experience of Meters genitalium
Of one’s 2932 respondents which have sampling weights, 2303 (79.9%) considering analysis on the most recent sexual connection (Desk 2 ). Meters genitalium frequency is actually significantly high certainly people who had an excellent non-White lover (Advertising = 11.0–62.4) otherwise a partner whoever battle/ethnicity try different from their particular (Pr = 8.4; 95% CI = dos.51, )pared for the prevalence regarding M genitalium one of the participants who believed the current partner got other concurrent couples, new frequency out of Yards genitalium among those exactly who considered its companion are faithful is actually lower (Pr = 0.1; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.61). Intimate behavior for example time between conference and you can first genital intercourse, regularity out-of genital sex, and oral otherwise responsive rectal sexual relationships weren’t rather associated that have Yards genitalium disease.
Connect with us