So in order to pass the legislation required for an amendment or any effective legislation to get big money out of politics we would first have to replace the big money legislators with small donor legislators.
The best case scenario for getting the big money legislators to pass any campaign finance reform legislation or amendments is twenty plus years from now spending billions to lobby big money legislators to go against the big money interests.
This is an important protection for small donors. Without money being considered speech their is no right to make political contributions.
It gives federal, state and local government the ability to regulate, limit, or prohibit contributions and expenditures of candidates.for reasons that could easily be interpreted to justify just about anything.
It states that artificial entities (such as Move to Amend or a candidates campaign organization) have no rights under the Constitution.
Under this amendment Congress could pass legislation that says that artificial entities can take unlimited contributions from anyone but can only take contributions from say one million people or any amount of people they want. So an artificial entity that was financed by small donor contributions of 200 dollars or less would only be able to raise a maximum 200 million dollars from the 1 million donors.
The citizens that would be unable to contribute could not challenge under this amendment because under this amendment money is not speech so they have no right to contribute.
If you say this will not work then you are saying democracy will not work, which is the opposite of your theory and what you usually say
Rather than wait and work twenty plus years for an amendment that will make the problem worse wasting valuable time and resources on a fools errand why not try an approach that could begin to be effective in 2022, grow to be more effective in 2024 and subsequent elections and will be much less costly?
This approach is based on the same principle in your theory that politicians want our votes more than big money and the basic principles of democracy that if politicians do not do what we want we will not vote for them.
Citizens can demand that politicians finance their campaigns only with contributions from small donors (no more than 200 dollars from any one person per campaign- 200primary, 200 general) in order to earn our votes.
Just 10% of the 150 million 2020 voters investing 100 dollars in contributions to small donor candidates would total 1.5 billion dollars and would just be the tip of the iceberg.
We seem to be able to use this approach on many other issues such as not voting for someone that doesn’t acknowledge the War on Habitat or not voting for someone that does acknowledge the War on Habitat.
He and his ilk are very dangerous because, they really haven’t seen any light
When will Ralph talk about the new movie about the 737 Max? Or did I miss it? How could they conclude the movie without discussing in greater detail the so-called fix they did to get it approved to fly again?
I am seeing news about skepticism on intelligence concerning Russia’s intentions in Ukraine being a result of Colin Powell’s testimony regarding Iraq and WMDs. I clearly remember watching that on TV and thinking it had to be a script handed to him by Cheney. I appreciate Wilkerson’s https://getbadcreditloan.com/payday-loans-nc/reidsville/ views now, but I wonder why he did not just resign at the time of that fiasco.
Wilkerson is the quintessential, converted former right-winger claiming to now see the light. However, those to the left of Attila the Hun want so desperately to believe him/them as if the they don’t believe their own analysis of the operation and effects of the pernicious US empire.
Connect with us