Current investigation tell you no high matchmaking ranging from Conscientiousness and narcissism (Miller ainsi que al

Participants

There are 437 (270 girls) users, have been employed via publicly available sexsearch promo code social networking websites. Its imply years is 23 years (SD = 5.96). Professionals have been requested to-do a couple of questionnaires a number of that aren’t associated into the current data. All the subjects offered the advised consent to your release of the attempt score to own look intentions, as well as had been offered opinions into standard result of the analysis. The brand new dataset analysed in latest data can be found at

Strategies

Insecure narcissism was measured with the Hypersensitive Narcissism Measure by the Hendin and you will Cheek (1997) from the Polish translation (discover Czarna ainsi que al. 2014). It contains ten activities having an excellent Likert-particularly response level from just one (firmly differ) so you can 5 (highly agree).

Grandiose narcissism are reviewed into validated Gloss variation (Bazinska and you will Drat-Ruszczak 2000) of your own Narcissistic Identification Inventory (Raskin and you can Hallway 1979). The things have been chose basing towards factor analysis (loadings surpassing .40) and you can represented the next subscales of your own NPI: Authority (11 situations), Self-Sufficiency (7), Vanity (5), and Exhibitionism (11). Participants ranked the degree of endorsement of every report having fun with good Likert-style of impulse format, from a single (will not apply at me) so you’re able to 5 (applies to me personally). The sum things creates a collection out of grandiose narcissism. It’s been revealed has just that Likert format NPI manifests similar create authenticity and you may a bit enhanced accuracy towards completely new pushed-choice format (Miller ainsi que al. 2018a).

The big Four was reviewed having Polish variation (Strus mais aussi al. 2014) of one’s International Identification Items Pond – Larger Four Element Scale (BFAS; DeYoung mais aussi al. 2007). This might be a 100-product measure of attribute domain names (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and you can Openness/Intellect) and the a couple lower-order regions of for each domain (Volatility, Withdrawal, Mercy, Politeness, Industriousness, Orderliness, Passion, Assertiveness, Intelligence, and you will Openness). People is asked to help you rate exactly how much the comments is actually related in it towards an effective Likert-sorts of size, in one (firmly disagree) to help you 5 (firmly agree).

Results

Basic, we looked at the fresh correlations anywhere between several versions away from narcissism and you will identity traits in addition to domains and you can factors (Dining table step one). Each other particular narcissism coordinated with character traits during the an equivalent means to fix earlier research (e.grams. Miller ainsi que al. 2011). Particularly, insecure narcissism is actually positively coordinated with Neuroticism, and you may adversely from the Agreeableness and Extraversion. Grandiose narcissism coordinated definitely with Extraversion, Openness/Intellect and you will Conscientiousness, and you will adversely which have Neuroticism and you can Agreeableness.

Subsequently, we compared the associations between each type of narcissism and aspects of personality within each domain. Therefore, we tested for the difference between two dependent correlations (Steiger 1980). Figure 1 illustrates graphically the patterns of correlations. We found that vulnerable narcissism was significantly and positively correlated with both aspects of Neuroticism and that correlations did not differ from one another (z =,215, p = 0.820), which supported H1. In addition, consistent with H2, grandiose narcissism was significantly and negatively correlated with Withdrawal, and this correlation was stronger than with Volatility (z = 5.85, p < 0.001). Grandiose narcissism correlated positively with both aspects of Extraversion; however, the association was stronger for Assertiveness (z = , p < 0.001), which supported H3. Vulnerable narcissism was equally negatively related to both Assertiveness and Enthusiasm (z = ?1.90; p = 0.060; H4). The results also supported H5; grandiose narcissism was negatively correlated with both aspects of Agreeableness. However, the correlation with Politeness was significantly stronger (z = 6.26; p < 0.001). The correlation of vulnerable narcissism with both aspects of Agreeableness was negative and the magnitudes of these correlations were similar (z = .261; p = 0.79). Thus, H6 was only partially supported, because we expected a higher association with Compassion. Finally, H7 was also supported: grandiose narcissism correlated positively with Intellect and this association was stronger than with Openness (z = 7.40; p < 0.001).